Mario Schweiger wrote:For sure, it has nothing to do - like YOU call it - STUPID detail of file size reduction.
"Stupid" had nothing to do with this webpage and/or it's technicalities. Everyone of us reduces his/her photos
to less than 500 kB in order to post them here. Everyone of us does it him/herself, as best one knows. I do it manually, picture by picture, which takes quite a lot of time and effort. I dont know what the others do. But
most of the pictures posted here are sharp. However, let me repeat that "... it's not exceptional that some really brilliant photographers sometimes post pictures like that in this forum. It must be some trivial technicallity...
But which one?!" THEIR fuzzy pictures have nothing to do with any problem either you or Thomas had with YOUR cameras, on this particular fieldtrip of yours - it has to be something else, something more general. I have no idea what. Does anybody?
The following picture is reduced to 1203 X 900, and only 287 kB. It's fairly sharp, I would say.
If you look at my "avatar" here, it's really small, 150 X 136, but still looks quite sharp...
The following one is 500 X 374 and, with the really puny 74.59 kB, still tolerably sharp: