Bert Vandebosch wrote:The picture of Hierophis viridiflavus seems to be a Hierophis gemonensis.
Hmmm... Don't think so.
Bert Vandebosch wrote:The picture of Hierophis viridiflavus seems to be a Hierophis gemonensis.
Bert Vandebosch wrote:The picture of Hierophis viridiflavus seems to be a Hierophis gemonensis.
Bert Vandebosch wrote:The picture of Hierophis viridiflavus seems to be a Hierophis gemonensis.
Mario Schweiger wrote:not sure.
do you have another pic of that specimen?
Jeroen Speybroeck wrote:Hmmm... Don't think so.
I would rather bet on a young individual of Hierophis viridiflavus carbonarius.
Ilian Velikov wrote:Why? Nobody is giving any reasons for their argument...
For me it is impossible to determine without a top view of the head.
Mario Schweiger wrote:Ilian Velikov wrote:Why? Nobody is giving any reasons for their argument...
For me it is impossible to determine without a top view of the head.
because I dont trust the color. It sees, picture has been taken in early or late sunlight, therefore this orange touch.
but the contrast between the "white" eye-ring and the main color of the head seems to be high, what points more to v. carbonarius.
Ilian, do you really think, you can determine by the markings on top of head (points, stripes, etc.)?
Mario Schweiger wrote:because I dont trust the color. It sees, picture has been taken in early or late sunlight, therefore this orange touch.
Mario Schweiger wrote:Ilian, do you really think, you can determine by the markings on top of head (points, stripes, etc.)?
Ilian Velikov wrote:Berislav, nobody mentioned anything about pholidosis and I think Mario was asking
generally if I think I could distinguish between the two species by head markings.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests