Jo napot Gergö,
well, the identification is a bit problematic and needs quite a lot of experience, because several species are very variable, also during different seasons, and some are very similar. Therefore the distribution is an important tool the identify the species too.
For example: D. raddei is the only species in the southern dry and rather hot parts of Armenia. Males are quite easy (except confusion with some nairensis males) but females and yougsters can be problematic.
After a week of intensive Darevskia search with the specialist of this genus - Marine Arakelyan - we received quite a sensibility for most species (this helps a lot) but only in the visited areas. Our most problematic species were D. dahli and female D. p. portschinskii.
The Darevskia from Kutaissi looks very similar to the ones we found on our way to Kasbegi and it should be also the same subspecies of rudis: chechenica.
In Tbilissi there is only one species: portschinskii
To identify the species I recommend you to look at pictures of the species in
http://www.lacerta.de The (possible) distribution of species and subspecies is also shown on this very good site
The second thing is to study Marines book "Herpetofauna of Armenia..."
For Georgia the best paper is by Bischoff: "Die Eidechsen Georgiens..." available in Mario's DB, unfortunately in German
Pelophylax is extremely variable in Georgia...
Wow - The Zortas Karer pinnacles must be amazing - I have to go to Syunik soon! I think, there could also be some undiscovered surprises in herpetofauna
The Caucasus is so diverse and intersting - this time we found 58 species and still missed some. We will place our report online in the deep winter, when it is more quiet...
all the best and Viszlat!
Thomas