fieldherping.eu

by **clovis voyageur** » Tue Jan 29, 2013 5:14 pm

Hi everyone, first topic on this forum, i hope you will be able to help me

I always have some problems to distinguish P melisellensis from P sicula.
I'd bet on sicula: white belly, masseteric scale small (i think...)

What is your opinion?

Yes, i know, i shouldn't feed wild animals :mrgreen:

20/08/2012, Sibenik, Croatia

by **Jeroen Speybroeck** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:17 am

I would say siculus, but I'm afraid Mario will laugh at me

by **Mario Schweiger** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:35 am

No laughing, Sir! :lol:

You are correct: Podarcis siculus campestris!
No supraciliar-lines.
Dorsal line reaches the pileus and isnt "fragmented".
Head shape
and this "oily" gloss is missing.

Mario

by **Jeroen Speybroeck** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:36 am

Well... now I'm happy for the rest of the day

by **clovis voyageur** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:47 pm

So am i

Thanks to both of you

by **Berislav Horvatic** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:04 pm

Now maybe you could change the title "Craotian podarcis"...?

by **Jeroen Speybroeck** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:03 pm

Don't be so severe, Barislev...

by **Berislav Horvatic** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:12 pm

Really glad to hear from you again, Yoreen...

by **Jeroen Speybroeck** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:31 pm

Berislav Horvatic wrote:Really glad to hear from you again, Yoreen...

I knew you would enjoy some Balgien humour

by **clovis voyageur** » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:21 pm

fieldherping.eu

Croatian Podarcis

Croatian Podarcis

Re: Craotian Podarcis

Re: Craotian Podarcis

Re: Craotian Podarcis

Re: Craotian Podarcis

Re: Craotian Podarcis

Re: Craotian Podarcis

Re: Craotian Podarcis

Re: Craotian Podarcis

Re: Croatian Podarcis

Who is online