I agree with everything you said, Ruggero. I also thought it's genuine, that's why I posted it here.
Ruggero Morimando wrote: I don't understand where lies the problem.
Me neither. I'm not sure if there is a problem...?
Berislav Horvatic wrote:Period. Or what?
Obviously I didn't intend to put a "period" since I wrote something else after my opinion on the authenticity of the report. Just shifting the question from "real or fake" (which I think is settled) to "how do you think it happened". I realize we can never know and we can only speculate but what's the harm in that? It's not everyday that humans get eaten by snakes.
I think a snake even as big and powerful as this would attack (to kill and eat) a human only in very rare circumstances. They've co-existed with humans long enough to have an inbuilt fear from us. So it was either a very very hungry and desperate snake, or the man died under other circumstances and was scavenged by the python. I tend to think it's the second one. Why would a snake, which can go months without eating, risk its life or at least serious injury by hunting the World's top predator, in the snake's natural environment where there's plenty of other prey. I think it didn't, I think it just saw an opportunity for a "free" meal and took it. What do you guys think?