Borji Heras wrote:Don't let this thread die! Habemus paper or not?
Jeroen Speybroeck wrote:Habeo sed non habemus.
Berislav Horvatic wrote:Jeroen Speybroeck wrote:Habeo sed non habemus.
I understand your reasons, and respect them, but for all of us who "can't wait", would you
just reveal to us your personal opinion whether THE PAPER as such (an sich) habet, or not.
Karim Chouchane wrote:1) So this viper is of hybrid origin between Vipera berus and Vipera ursinii ?
2) It would be an equivalent of Vipera magnifica and Vipera orlovi in the alps ?
3) If so, what is the level of introgression of vipera ursinii ?
4) Is there a binomial name available for this new viper?
5) How many populations exist?
6) and is the paper giving their exact localities?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests