Jeroen Speybroeck wrote:Agreed to all except last two sentences.
Which refers to
"Probably less than on the “principal” channel. In that respect, there is a difference between a glass lizard (or any lizard) and a snake."
What's wrong with that? Unlike snakes, lizards have "classical" ears, that detect air-transmitted vibrations.
For them, it's the only option, so one might presume it to have been perfected enough (by evolution).
Presumably much better than in snakes, for which it's only the (recently discovered) second option. Or is it?
So far, we don't know for sure, of course.
Jeroen Speybroeck wrote:And unsure on the validity or usefulness of the link you provided, as it obviously does not factor in the new insights.
Doesn't it? OK, useful or not, "new insights" or not, but it demonstrates something that people might like
to hear. Nothing more than that, but also no less than that.