I don´t estimate, I simply count them.
To estimate something like a vipera population is not easy
![Very Happy :-D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
In my mind it makes sense if you don´t have much time and if you just want to have a housenumber of the population size.
But if you visit your area regulary, counting is way more precise than "any" estimation. People can do that and it´s for sure interesting to play with numbers but I failed while trying it. Too many factors that don´t fit and it takes incredible much time with my type of data
![Very Happy :-D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
I still think counting is by far more realsitic for my case than a hand made estimation.
For example. If I count in 2009 exact 100 animals after visiting the spot 50 or more times all over the year, I say 100 animals + a few I was not able to find.
How much is this + ???
Well, you can answer that the next years more precise. Because for example in 2010 and 2011 most probably I find a hand full of animals that I allready knew from before that I was not able to find in 2009. So I can say population size is around 105 + a few more that are still hiding from me. So lets say populations size is abour 110 animals +- a few. Who cares if 119 would be the number or just 106 and if they are 134 in real - even better
![Very Happy :-D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)