Robin Duborget wrote:Beautiful (the species and the pictures !)
I remember seing recently this species in some papers about extinct frogs being rediscovered, but didn't know it was "realisable" to see them in the wild ! Well done !
Robin
ps : But I disagree with the term "living fossil", neither actual species can be called "living fossil" in the light of the most recents papers about evolution.
The "living fossil" species and their ancestor are ot the same thing (there is an inevitable accumulation of mutations other the ages), even if it look like (only on the outside).
Thanks Robin, never would I have thought to see this species in the wild. One of the most special species I have seen in the wild!
As for the living fossil, I know what you are aiming at and of course you are right about that. But to me if an animal already existed millions of years ago and still exists today, only slightly changed in overall look, I would call them like that.